Reply to Re: LAME 3.97b2/3.97

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by Joel on 11/04/06 15:39

"Greg" <gjyrhythm@hotmail.com> wrote:

>I have been encoding my CDs for a while using LAME 3.97b2. Recently I got
>curious and decided to check out what the latest "released" version is of
>the LAME codec, and saw that 3.97 is now released and seems to be the
>recommended version to use. I haven't seen much, however, about what
>differences there might be between the recently released 3.97 and the beta2
>version that I've been using. Any reason I should change to 3.97? Or would
>it be just as well to keep using 3.97b2?


You should go ahead and start using the final, I would say, but
nevertheless, don't re-rip any CDs just 'cause a new version is out.
There's nothing wrong with the files you've already made with a
previous version.

--
Joel Crump

I'm bipartisan, and bisexual.

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"