Posted by Citizen Bob on 11/04/06 18:09

On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 11:53:03 -0800, "PTravel"
<ptravel@travelersvideo.com> wrote:

>> Those laws are illegitimate, and therefore do not bind.

>The relevant sections of the Copyright Act are not "illegitimate" as a
>matter of law. As such, they are binding.

They are binding as stautatory law, but not as common law.

Statuatory law depends on the end of gun barrel. Common law depends on
1 juror (cf. nullification).

>> It would be a colossal waste of time to sue me because I don't break
>> any law.

>Then you have nothing to worry about.

I never did.

>> The Mob has mininterpreted the law and someday Congress will
>> stop taking bribes and do something to rectify the situation.

>I agree that Congress taking bribes to pass laws (and that is exactly what
>lobbyists do) is a serious problem, probably one of the most serious
>problems facing this country. However, as long as the laws it passes comply
>with Constitutional, they are legitimate and enforceable.

That is not true. In the first place defendants who violate the law
can be exonerated by 1 juror.

Secondly the govt itself can violate any law it chooses with full
impunity.


--

"First and last, it's a question of money. Those men who own the earth
make the laws to protect what they have. They fix up a sort of fence or
pen around what they have, and they fix the law so the fellow on the
outside cannot get in. The laws are really organized for the protection of
the men who rule the world. They were never organized or enforced to do
justice. We have no system for doing justice, not the slightest in the world."
--Clarence Darrow

[Back to original message]