Posted by Citizen Bob on 11/06/06 18:05

On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 15:58:30 GMT, jayembee
<jayembeenospam@snurcher.com> wrote:

>> Therefore the law you claim is binding is not really binding -

>Horseshit. If you really believe that, then *no* law is binding.

That does not follow from what I have stated.

There are many laws that the governed consent to, in which a jury
would convict.

>You could murder someone, maintain your innocence, and if one
>juror out of twelve believes you and votes "Not Guilty", you are
>exhonerated of your crime.

Straw man.

You clearly do not understand the doctrine of innocence.

>That in no way means that laws against murder are "non-binding".

Hysterical nonsense.

--

"First and last, it's a question of money. Those men who own the earth
make the laws to protect what they have. They fix up a sort of fence or
pen around what they have, and they fix the law so the fellow on the
outside cannot get in. The laws are really organized for the protection of
the men who rule the world. They were never organized or enforced to do
justice. We have no system for doing justice, not the slightest in the world."
--Clarence Darrow

[Back to original message]