Reply to Re: LAME 3.97b2/3.97

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by NRen2k5 on 11/08/06 05:52

Mike Walsh wrote:
> I find it interesting that it took almost 5 years to get from LAME
> 3.90 to 3.97. There doesn't seem to be much difference in performance
> between versions unless you are working at the extremes of quality or
> file size. When I was converting my CDs to MP3 I tried versions from
> 3.7 to 3.91 and could not hear any difference in sound quality and
> only a slight difference in file size.

Well, that's just you. I've noticed quality improvements since 3.89,
that's for certain. I'm also happy with the improvements to Alt Preset
Standard (now -V2).

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"