Posted by Mike Walsh on 11/08/06 16:32

My hearing may not be as good as yours due to my advanced age.

NRen2k5 wrote:
>
> Mike Walsh wrote:
> > I find it interesting that it took almost 5 years to get from LAME
> > 3.90 to 3.97. There doesn't seem to be much difference in performance
> > between versions unless you are working at the extremes of quality or
> > file size. When I was converting my CDs to MP3 I tried versions from
> > 3.7 to 3.91 and could not hear any difference in sound quality and
> > only a slight difference in file size.
>
> Well, that's just you. I've noticed quality improvements since 3.89,
> that's for certain. I'm also happy with the improvements to Alt Preset
> Standard (now -V2).

--
Mike Walsh
West Palm Beach, Florida, U.S.A.

[Back to original message]