Posted by Guest on 11/09/06 19:24

--
This post is Sponsored by: www.overheadsoft.com

http://www.linkreferral.com/cgi-bin/linkreferal/adwel.cgi?oldrefid=20013
"Jim Gilliland" <usemylastname@cheerful.com> wrote in message
news:4553669f$0$12998$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
> Guest wrote:
>
>> I see the difference. If I did not, I would feel bad about having
>> purchased an uneeded cable.
>
> Precisely! It is exactly that situation that triggers the strongest bias.

Not it's not. I would have just put the cable back on Ebay. Instead, I
like it.

>
>> Bias was eliminated from the start. Yes, some of us do have impartial
>> minds! YOU may be incapable of supressing bias, but I am.
>
> <vbg> You dig yourself deeper with every word you write.
>
>> Like I wrote, I saw this movie at least 500 times, so I know what is
>> what.
>
> Geez, man, get a life! 500 times? That's obsessive.

Or maybe I love the movie? It also means that I know the film very well...

>
> As I said before:
>
> You are free to continue to enjoy your system with whichever cables give
> you the
> most pleasure. But you shouldn't expect others to accept your claims -
> especially when they contradict well-established norms.

Fuck norms. Just because some of you clowns aacept what an 'official' place
or person says does not mean that is the final word.

>
> You've asked us to accept something that we know to be impossible.

I really did not ASK you to ACCEPT a damned thing. I told you MY experience
and pleasure with the result. If you choose to not break of of the box,
then that is you.

And you've
> done so without a single shred of usable evidence.

If I were to take a screen shot before and after, then you would proably say
"how do we know that is the exact same frame?" In other words, you will
make a whole news set of excuses.

Is it any wonder that
> everyone here has rejected your claims?

[Back to original message]