Posted by Art Landy on 11/09/06 21:40

What a spicy thread! Can't resist putting in my two cents. The arguments
seems to be the ususal "Subjectivists vs the Objectivists" type and both
tend to adhere strongly to their positions. It is hard to convince a
subjectivist that their experience is valid but flawed in the resulting
conclusions. And itis hard to convince an Objectivists that the
subjectivists aren't full of crap!
"Guest" <llcoolj@comcast.com> wrote in message
news:5Su4h.2897$IR4.629@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
>
>
> --
> This post is Sponsored by: www.overheadsoft.com
>
> http://www.linkreferral.com/cgi-bin/linkreferal/adwel.cgi?oldrefid=20013
> "David" <davey@home.net> wrote in message
> news:8cidnbp8zKKn6M_YnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> "Guest" <llcoolj@comcast.com> wrote The AR outperformed the Monster to
>> a very larger degree.
>>
>>
>> As brilliant and renowned engineer Henry Kloss, et al, turn over in
>> their grave . . .
>>
>
> Ahh shit.
>

[Back to original message]