Posted by Tom Stiller on 11/09/06 22:23

In article <gqedndhmAvLhPc7YnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Art Landy" <artlandy@comcast.net> wrote:

> "Guest" <llcoolj@comcast.com> wrote in message
> news:5Su4h.2897$IR4.629@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
> >
> >
> > --
> > This post is Sponsored by: www.overheadsoft.com
> >
> > http://www.linkreferral.com/cgi-bin/linkreferal/adwel.cgi?oldrefid=20013
> > "David" <davey@home.net> wrote in message
> > news:8cidnbp8zKKn6M_YnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> >> "Guest" <llcoolj@comcast.com> wrote The AR outperformed the Monster to
> >> a very larger degree.
> >>
> >>
> >> As brilliant and renowned engineer Henry Kloss, et al, turn over in
> >> their grave . . .
> >>
> >
> > Ahh shit.
> >
> What a spicy thread! Can't resist putting in my two cents. The arguments
> seems to be the ususal "Subjectivists vs the Objectivists" type and both
> tend to adhere strongly to their positions. It is hard to convince a
> subjectivist that their experience is valid but flawed in the resulting
> conclusions. And itis hard to convince an Objectivists that the
> subjectivists aren't full of crap!

No, the argument is about lack of understanding about digital
representation of analog signals and their subsequent over bit-serial
pathways. One side thinks that minor degradation of the digital signal
will be reflected in the reconstructed analog waveform (which his sharp
eyes and eyes can detect). The other side understands digital signal
processing, error correcting codes, and transmission lines.

--
Tom Stiller

PGP fingerprint = 5108 DDB2 9761 EDE5 E7E3
7BDA 71ED 6496 99C0 C7CF

[Back to original message]