Posted by Guest on 11/10/06 19:53

--
This post is Sponsored by: www.overheadsoft.com

http://www.linkreferral.com/cgi-bin/linkreferal/adwel.cgi?oldrefid=20013
"JerrySmith'sTightEnd" <jhgfjh@hjhg.com> wrote in message
news:vpT4h.691$Gw4.129@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
>
> "Art Landy" <artlandy@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:gqedndhmAvLhPc7YnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> What a spicy thread! Can't resist putting in my two cents. The arguments
>> seems to be the ususal "Subjectivists vs the Objectivists" type and both
>> tend to adhere strongly to their positions. It is hard to convince a
>> subjectivist that their experience is valid but flawed in the resulting
>> conclusions. And itis hard to convince an Objectivists that the
>> subjectivists aren't full of crap!
>
> An interesting observation, but not entirely accurate in this thread.
> Some of the differences in analog cables and other technology (like the
> great tube vs. solid state debate) can actually have scientific
> bases...but just how they work in te real world is a matter of opinion,
> which I'm happy to be subjective about. This guest tool can't even make
> up a scientific rationale for this crap.
>

I am not trying to. This is an HDTV group, not a scientific debate. Which
means I deal with the real world results and not what the formula says the
results should be.

[Back to original message]