Posted by Guest on 11/11/06 16:32

--
This post is Sponsored by: www.overheadsoft.com

http://www.linkreferral.com/cgi-bin/linkreferal/adwel.cgi?oldrefid=20013
"Camper" <greentoow@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:d9j5h.62852$rP1.23207@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "Guest" <llcoolj@comcast.com> wrote in message
> news:dO45h.8072$9v5.6861@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
>>
>>
>> --
>> This post is Sponsored by: www.overheadsoft.com
>>
>> http://www.linkreferral.com/cgi-bin/linkreferal/adwel.cgi?oldrefid=20013
>> "Jim Gilliland" <usemylastname@cheerful.com> wrote in message
>> news:45547afc$0$17686$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
>>> Art Landy wrote:
>>>> What a spicy thread! Can't resist putting in my two cents. The
>>>> arguments seems to be the ususal "Subjectivists vs the Objectivists"
>>>> type and both tend to adhere strongly to their positions. It is hard
>>>> to convince a subjectivist that their experience is valid but flawed in
>>>> the resulting conclusions. And itis hard to convince an Objectivists
>>>> that the subjectivists aren't full of crap!
>>>
>>> I wish that were true. The single "subjectivist" here doesn't seem to
>>> be able to support his position at all.
>>>
>>> I could easily quote you many of the arguments of the subjectivists,
>>> even though I certainly fall more into the objectivist camp. The
>>> problem here is that the original poster can't even put together a
>>> coherent discussion of the topic. It appears that we are (as the saying
>>> goes) "engaging in a battle of wits with an unarmed man".
>>
>> That's what your girl might say when you take off your pants!
>
> You really sound like a 16 year old in some of your phraseology.
>

Your girls says that you LOOK like a 16 year old with your pants off.

Just because your 'joke' is supposed to be thoughtful and 'intellectual does
not mean that it is not juvenile.

[Back to original message]