Posted by Guest on 11/13/06 01:05

--
This post is Sponsored by: www.overheadsoft.com

http://www.linkreferral.com/cgi-bin/linkreferal/adwel.cgi?oldrefid=20013
"Camper" <greentoow@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:0Xz5h.63232$rP1.10537@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "Guest" <llcoolj@comcast.com> wrote in message
> news:jWm5h.6908$yl4.3147@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
>>
>>
>> --
>> This post is Sponsored by: www.overheadsoft.com
>>
>> http://www.linkreferral.com/cgi-bin/linkreferal/adwel.cgi?oldrefid=20013
>> "Camper" <greentoow@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:d9j5h.62852$rP1.23207@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>>>
>>> "Guest" <llcoolj@comcast.com> wrote in message
>>> news:dO45h.8072$9v5.6861@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> This post is Sponsored by: www.overheadsoft.com
>>>>
>>>> http://www.linkreferral.com/cgi-bin/linkreferal/adwel.cgi?oldrefid=20013
>>>> "Jim Gilliland" <usemylastname@cheerful.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:45547afc$0$17686$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
>>>>> Art Landy wrote:
>>>>>> What a spicy thread! Can't resist putting in my two cents. The
>>>>>> arguments seems to be the ususal "Subjectivists vs the Objectivists"
>>>>>> type and both tend to adhere strongly to their positions. It is hard
>>>>>> to convince a subjectivist that their experience is valid but flawed
>>>>>> in the resulting conclusions. And itis hard to convince an
>>>>>> Objectivists that the subjectivists aren't full of crap!
>>>>>
>>>>> I wish that were true. The single "subjectivist" here doesn't seem to
>>>>> be able to support his position at all.
>>>>>
>>>>> I could easily quote you many of the arguments of the subjectivists,
>>>>> even though I certainly fall more into the objectivist camp. The
>>>>> problem here is that the original poster can't even put together a
>>>>> coherent discussion of the topic. It appears that we are (as the
>>>>> saying goes) "engaging in a battle of wits with an unarmed man".
>>>>
>>>> That's what your girl might say when you take off your pants!
>>>
>>> You really sound like a 16 year old in some of your phraseology.
>>>
>>
>> Your girls says that you LOOK like a 16 year old with your pants off.
>>
>> Just because your 'joke' is supposed to be thoughtful and 'intellectual
>> does not mean that it is not juvenile.
>
> If you thought it was a joke then perhaps you haven't made it to 16 yet.

Yet another thing that your girl(or guy) says when you pull your pants down.

[Back to original message]