Posted by Ken Maltby on 11/20/06 21:01

"AnthonyR" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:8mo8h.16949$tb6.12447@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com...
>
> "Martin Heffels" <is.itme@oris.ityou.info> wrote in message
> news:bv24m21i0tb0p3hcc1ks0vq63b072a8pri@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:46:32 GMT, "AnthonyR" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Well, live and learn I guess, but the web page at videoguys.com hasn't
>>>been
>>>changed this last Thursday when I wrote to Gary so I am wondering, if
>>>it's
>>>not a deceptive ad on purpose? Gary I had more faith in you than that
>>>after
>>>all these years of helpful posts on this group.
>>
>> Well you are jumping to conclusions very quick, AnthonyR. Your original
>> question hasn't been answered, and yet you talk about "deceptive
>> advertising". Now you have a good right to complain about talking so long
>> until you receive an answer, but the other thing is out of order at the
>> moment!
>>
>> -martin-
>> --
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> I hope that I am wrong, I've been waiting for 4 days without opening the
> shrink wrap on the training DVD in case they wanted to exchange it for me,
> and I got a reply from them in one day last week when I asked a question
> before ordering, but as I was eager to get to the training part and no
> replies in 4 days I got a little antsy, lol.
> Like I said, if it was an honest mistake, I will gladly apologize but why
> the silence when sales replies are handles so quickly?
> And on the phone Kelly told me, that the promo is for just the basic
> training, not the complete and when I told her the web clearly shows and
> say it's the complete being advertised she wanted me to speak to John the
> tech guy. How is he going to handle incorrect advertising? It didn't make
> sense to me.
> But I'll see if he ever calls me back or I hear from Gary on here.
>
> Thanks for your reply Martin
>
>

Perhaps you should make a post with the subject line:
"Newbe looking for video gear".

[Back to original message]