|  | Posted by Goro on 10/31/14 11:35 
Roy L. Fuchs wrote:> On 24 Dec 2005 08:26:50 -0800, "Goro" <evilninjax@yahoo.com> Gave us:
 >
 > >
 > >Allan wrote:
 > >> On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 14:35:04 GMT, Justin <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote:
 > >>
 > >> >Allan wrote on [Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:45:17 -0500]:
 > >> >>  Here's the top five TV-DVD sellers of 2005, from bottom to top:
 > >> >>
 > >> >> 5. Friends 9.x (790,000 units)
 > >> >> 4. The Simpsons 6.x (830,000 units)
 > >> >> 3. Seinfeld 4.x (860,000 units)
 > >> >> 2. Lost 1.x (1,040,000 units)
 > >> >> 1. Chappelle's Show 2.x Uncensored (2,840,000 units)
 > >> >
 > >> >Not bad for a dead medium.
 > >>
 > >> "one of the few categories in the now-mature DVD business that's still
 > >> on a steep growth trajectory."
 > >
 > >i liked this part from TFA :
 > >
 > >This growth in TV-DVD is both good and bad for the home entertainment
 > >business in general, Adams said. On the positive side, the higher price
 > >points help maintain profits as prices for theatrical catalog titles
 > >"and even fairly recent hits" sink to new lows, he said.
 > >
 > >And yet he can't help but wonder whether all those "complete season"
 > >sets are eating up viewing time that used to be spent watching movies.
 > >
 > >"Those are a lot of hours people are buying for $30," Adams said, "as
 > >opposed to a two-hour movie for $20."
 > >
 > >-goro-
 >
 >
 >   Well, one doesn't sit and watch the entire season in one sitting...
 > usually.
 >
 >   I usually watch several episodes at a time though...   :-]
 
 Well, I don't think that he meant that people do that (although, I did
 with ROME and basically did that with SLEEPER CELL).   But buying (say)
 18 hrs of viewing for $30 is pretty nice value and you have to watch
 that sometime.  Say that it's a show you already like (MIAMI VICE, for
 eg), then you might not be inclined to buy some new movies until you've
 finished watching it.  And if you've bough a few tv boxsets, you might
 have enough viewing queued up for a good while, reducing your impulse
 for purchasing new movies.
 
 >   Kung Fu is good.
 >
 >   The Greatest American Hero is good, though wasn't filmed or directed
 > so good.  The same "front of the house scene"  appears in almost every
 > episode, and in many, more than once.  Same shadows and everything.
 > Sad that.
 
 wow.  I used to love GAH, but i recently watched a couple of eps and
 thought it was really dated and just couldn't get into it at all.  Of
 course, somehow I still manage to enjoy and like 21 JUMP ST, though, so
 I'm no beacon of good taste!  :)
 
 >   Hell, shooting TV shows on video instead of film has got to be
 > cheaper.  That's good, as they can spend more on doing it right.
 
 I think TV fills some nice need.  Movies may be akin to a nice meal,
 while tv shows are like snacks or fast food.  Soemtimes you want that
 nice sit-down meal with all the trimmings (2hr movie), but sometimes
 you just want to kill that jonesing for some *cruncH* (1/2 sitcom).
 
 -goro-
 [Back to original message] |