Reply to Re: Youtube copyright infringements are not all bad for the copyright holders?

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by PTravel on 12/06/06 19:56

"Bill" <trash@christian-horizons.org> wrote in message
news:ur-dnaVkSMpzhurYnZ2dnUVZ_t2dnZ2d@golden.net...
> Actually, I thought you said that you didn't think any copyright owner
> ever benefitted from copyright infringement. I think I read that twice,
> carefully, but if I am mistaken, pardon me.

I didn't say anthing like that. I said availability of copyright isn't
predicated upon harm to the owner, exclusive rights means just that, and
changing it would require an amendment to the Constitution.


>
>
> PTravel wrote:
>> "Bill" <trash@christian-horizons.org> wrote in message
>> news:lN6dnSQ0lM3BT-vYnZ2dnUVZ_sKdnZ2d@golden.net...
>>
>>>Does everyone forget that The Grateful Dead actually encouraged people to
>>>tape their concerts?
>>
>>
>> What has that to do with this discussion?
>>
>>
>>>So... were they stupid? Did they lose a lot of money? Did they go broke
>>>because nobody wanted to buy their recordings any more?
>>
>>
>> No. What has that to do with this discussion?
>>
>>
>>
>>>If what most posters here said here was true, that should absolutely have
>>>been the case.
>>
>>
>> I haven't seen any discussion in this thread about the economic effects
>> of non-enforcement of copyright.

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"