|
Posted by Michael Wozniak on 12/07/06 04:39
"Doc" <docsavage20@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1165443687.042869.160050@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com...
>
> Mike Rivers wrote:
>> Doc wrote:
>>
>> > What's far more compelling to me at those same
>> > points and others is the visible (and audible) bodily tension and
>> > release
>> > and that the vibrato is very obvious in her throat & jaw and that it
>> > matches
>> > the sound exactly.
>>
>> Geez, I guess I'm just going to have to break down and watch that
>> video.
>
> Careful, folks might think you're showing interest.. ;-)
>
>> Who cares about the audio at this point? If you can see so much
>> detail in the video, it must be some fabulous camera work and lighting.
>
> ??....You say this as if normally the lenses are coated with vaseline.
> It doesn't take HD to see it. This kid of thing has always been
> noticeable in reasonably close-up shots if you're looking for it.
>
>> I would never look for that kind of detail if I was watching a singer
>> on TV, in fact, I'd probably be reading the newspaper and listening to
>> the music.
>>
>> Unless of course there was a good shot of her boobs.
>
> .laff
>
> Miss A is very conservatively dressed but plenty of Sasha Cohen's
> epidermis is visible.
>
OK, I gotta say it before anyone else does - are CA's boobs real or faked?
Mikey
Nova Music Productions
[Back to original message]
|