Reply to Re: Youtube copyright infringements are not all bad for the copyright holders?

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by ptravel on 12/09/06 06:06

Bob Quintal wrote:
> "PTravel" <ptravel@travelersvideo.com> wrote in
> news:4ttrbaF14gp0jU1@mid.individual.net:
>
> >
> > Ah, now I get it. Laws and the Constitution mean what you
> > take them to mean.
>
> No they do not. They mean something to those who created them, and
> something else to the judges who legislate by judicial fiat.

And now I understand where you're coming from, and also where you get
"facts." No, judges don't legislate by judicial fiat, and you would do
will to do some research on constitutional law, rather than relying on
whatever radio talk show hosts or web blogs that you do.


> >
> > Sorry. The Constitution was NEVER intended to be understood
> > and construed at such a basic and primitive level.
> >
> I just saw An Inconvenient Truth. Mr Gore quotes Mark Twain."It
> ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you
> know for sure that just ain't so."
>
> It fits you perfectly.

No ad hominem attacks, hunh? I am always staggered by those who think
ignorance is a virtue. It's not, you know.

>
> --
> Bob Quintal
>
> PA is y I've altered my email address.
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"