Posted by anthonyberet on 12/21/06 22:09

Theophilus wrote:
> "anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message
> news:4uln9pF18i9qkU1@mid.individual.net...
>> Theophilus wrote:
>>> "anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:4uljodF18njsiU2@mid.individual.net...
>>>> Theophilus wrote:
>>>>> "Joe" <joe@fakee.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:15t7o2t35vgfep23eqi4kojijr1cgvc4tu@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 04:50:36 -0600, "Theophilus"
>>>>>> <intrexATsasktelDOTnet> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is impossible to "convert" to atheism since atheism is not only
>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>> a religion, it is a rejection of religion. That's like saying you
>>>>>>>> joined nothing.
>>>>>>> Atheism IS a religion, the most hypocritical known.
>>>>>> Sure. In the same way that 'not collecting stamps' is a hobby.
>>>>> What if you NEED stamps? Read the whole post, not just the part your
>>>>> object to.
>>>> No I think you have lost it... what has needing or not needing stamps
>>>> got to do with it?
>>>>
>>>> You asserted that Atheism is a religion. It isn't. Sort it out!
>>> Yes, I made the assertion that atheism is a religion and then went on to
>>> say why.
>> No you didn't. You just think you did.
>
> Demonstrate otherwise. This is just another assertion.
>
The burden of proof isn't on me, it is on you.

As you are probably aware, it is sometimes difficult to prove a negative ;o)

[Back to original message]