Posted by Bob Quintal on 12/22/06 03:15

ptravel@travelersvideo.com wrote in
news:1166680794.543053.52710@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com:

>
> Bob Quintal wrote:
>> "PTravel" <ptravel@travelersvideo.com> wrote in
>> news:4us040F19nhtvU1@mid.individual.net:
>>
>> >
>> > "Larry in AZ" <usenet2@DE.LETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote in
>> > message news:Xns989ED5713E1B7thefrogprince@69.28.173.184...
>> >> Waiving the right to remain silent, Bob Quintal
>> >> <rquintal@sPAmpatico.ca> said:
>
> My god, but you're an idiot.
Well it takes a bigger one to know one.


>
> 1. Fair use is an equitable doctrine, meaning it is decided
> by judges who use the four statutory factors as a mere
> framework. You don't have the slightest clue of any of the
> niche doctrines that government fair use.

I know nothing in your book, but I know enough to get by. I also
know that you regularly use a similar but incorrect word for the
term you mean.
>
> 2. Incidental reproduction is a very difficult and unsettled
> doctrine that, obviously, you know absolutely nothing about.

Yes it's unsettled, in the sense that there is loads of conflicting
jurisprudence. That is because there is a strong move by the
moneyed powers in publishing to push for one interpretation, which
some of the judicary succumb to. Other judges have ruled based on
the

> I've explained it before, here, and in some detail, including
> case cites. I'd suggest you spend some time on google before
> you shoot your mouth off.
>
I've posted citations from Findlaw and other sites that rebut your
citations. So?
You hold an opinion based on your learned interpretation of the
law. I'll hold my interpretation based on my learned interpretation
of the law.

> <Naive and totally incorrect "analysis" deleted.>
>
Not naive, but since you cannot refute it, you slander.
>
>>
>> I'm completely correct.The law that allows copyright of
>> fiction and public performance has never been challenged on
>> the grounds that it violates the Constitution, but I think
>> such a challenge would have a fair chance of winning.
>
> Who cares what you think? You don't know anything about the
> law.

That's a baseless opinion.
>
>>
>> Besides the law is an ass.
>> -- Charles Dickens
>
> No, it's Bob Quintal whose an ass. Try reading the Dickens
> quote in context -- you didn't even get that right.
>
Gee, you really think that the quote is out of context?
The context, Mr Bumble, is that Copyright Law assumes that nobody
can use copyright material without permission: but Reality is very
different.

>> What does that make lawyers?
>
> Educated and knowledgable.

You've got one hell of an inflated ego.
In every case that comes before a judge, one litigant's lawyer
loses. All lawyers lose sometimes. Now's your turn.

What does that make you?

Educated and knowledgable.

--
Bob Quintal

PA is y I've altered my email address.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[Back to original message]