Posted by Alpha on 01/01/07 22:52

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:f72jp2hojh974mb56tbrr22ebsuk9v331m@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 1 Jan 2007 12:44:37 -0800, "Alpha" <none@none.NET> Gave us:
>
>>If it takes a long time, it will fail. The next generation of video could
>>well be based on direct cable or satellite transmission and stored on
>>silicon (or one of the emerging new memory materials).
>
> You sure don't know much about data streams.

Yes I do. I invented some.

>
> Cable/over wire/air does not now, nor will it ever likely deliver
> high end audio streams. The video is degraded on most channels too,
> even some declared as hi def. Any given cable channel has 6MHz of
> bandwidth. THAT's ALL. Tell me, chump, how does one pipe 25Mb/s over
> a 6Mhz channel?

Stupid question.

>
> An HD DVD delivers the stream, and the audio NOW. Leave it to a
> bunch of pants down past the asscrack idiots to look at the new thing,
> scratch their heads and say "but does it work?".
>
> When are you dopes gonna get a clue?

You are clueless. Do you think the status quo will remain? The only
constant in the universe is change...particularly for media.

[Back to original message]