Posted by Muggs on 01/02/07 17:30

Thanks for your help Joel.

I think I'm going to give Napster a try, but I really appreciate your input.

Muggs

Joel wrote:
> Muggs <Muggs8THE2TRASH8@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Now I'm leaning toward Napster. Any reasons that I shouldn't?
>
> Personally, I would still use iTunes to MP3 conversions, since MP3s
> use less battery power - but, WMAs at 128 Kbps (or, AACs at the same,
> for iPod owners) would be smaller than the conversion to
> LAME --preset standard. So, it depends on your priorities.
>

[Back to original message]