Reply to Re: recording analog stereo to DVD recorder hard drive

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by musicman on 01/04/07 12:10

Gary wrote:
> "Brian W" <brian.NOSPAMwescombe@PLEASEntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:HITmh.13959$Wy6.12514@newsfe1-win.ntli.net...
> >
> > "musicman" <stradlinizzy@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:1167853188.744424.187480@k21g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >>
> >> Brian W wrote:
> >>> "musicman" <stradlinizzy@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:1167496018.151852.189090@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com...
> >>> >
> >>> > Gary wrote:
> >>> >> There is no real need to change the audio spec for the different
> >>> >> length
> >>> >> as
> >>> >> in the scheme of things the audio is such a small part of the data on
> >>> >> a
> >>> >> Video DVD
> >>> >>
> >>> >> just a thought.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Gary
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > there is a difference, because I can record much more music on a DVD
> >>> > if
> >>> > I reduce the resolution settings on the record specs menu- i.e. if I
> >>> > extend the quality setting from "best" to "normal", I can fit more
> >>> > music on the disk.
> >>>
> >>> Not necessarily, as the DVD recorder is still recording a video stream,
> >>> even
> >>> if it's blank. So using the longer-length record setting, the audio
> >>> qualityprobably isn't being affected.
> >>> In other words, recording 4 hours of just music will use exactly the
> >>> same
> >>> amount of disc space as recording 4 hours of video and audio.
> >>
> >>
> >> that's not how this machine works- changing the time resolution settngs
> >> allows you to put more or less music on one DVD+R disk
> >>
> >> so the faster settings also improve quality
> >>
> >> do you have a DVDR ? If you did, you'd see what I mean
> >
> > Yes, I have a Panasonic DVD recorder. It records all audio at 256kbps in
> > Dolby Digital whatever quality setting I use. Four hour setting allows
> > four hours of music (with or without video), two hour setting allows two
> > hours of music (with or without video). But the audio quality does not
> > change.
> >
>
> That was my point. the time is for how much recording time ( normally with
> pictures)
>
> What a waste of disk space to record only the audio on a 4 gig disk.
>
> Just think how many cd uncompressed tracks you could get on that. or how
> much MP3 in superb quality. Hours and hours and hours


I can fit 8 hours of music on a CD+R at the lowest resolution

I just put 6 LP's on a CD+R even at the highest/fastest resolution

what the hell are you talking about ?

the speed/resolution/record time is totally adjustable

the HDD will hold 120 hours of music- that's almost 240 LP's

what's easier- keeping a rack of 240 CD's in a pile somewhere, and
having to load them in/out to play them

or just turning on the TV, hit "library", and click on the LP I want to
here- and the music comes out

why store 200 CD's in a player, when this stores it inside the HDD

and they also make them with twice as much HDD space as this one has

that means the one with more HDD space, will store 240 hours of music

that's almost 480 LP's stored inside the box on the HDD- without buying
a single CD

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"