Posted by M.I.5� on 01/12/07 07:35

"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:8afcq2t0sn8qcpavgrqq8gk3q8hq0ift9k@4ax.com...
> M.I.5� wrote:
>
>>"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>> M.I.5� wrote:
>>>
>>>>Then try it for yourself. The difference is unmistakable. It may fly
>>>>in
>>>>the face of what you may think should be the case, but it happens to be
>>>>true.
>>>
>>> It would be expected that many displays rated at 576x720 do not
>>> display this much information with perfection, and that a
>>> higher-performace display would do a better job of it.
>>>
>>> But, no, your claim that you need a a 1440x1152 display to fully
>>> resolve DVD, is NOT true.
>>
>>Have you actually tried it. Thought not.
>
> Idiot.
>

Not really. You are, if you posted about something that you clearly haven't
made any attempt to verify. Engineering is full of examples of things that
shouldn't be in theory, but are in practice.

[Back to original message]