Posted by WinField on 01/12/07 18:45

M.I.5¾ wrote:
> "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
> news:i0s9q29nj6pn0c4po1f3r89hsjlij3rnid@4ax.com...
>
>>M.I.5¾ wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Then try it for yourself. The difference is unmistakable. It may fly in
>>>the face of what you may think should be the case, but it happens to be
>>>true.
>>
>>It would be expected that many displays rated at 576x720 do not
>>display this much information with perfection, and that a
>>higher-performace display would do a better job of it.
>>
>>But, no, your claim that you need a a 1440x1152 display to fully
>>resolve DVD, is NOT true.
>>
>
>
> Have you actually tried it. Thought not.


Have you actually tried it? Where? What was the model/manufacturer of
the 1440x1152 display you tested? Against what consumer displays did
you test? What testing methodology was used?

Methinks your oscilloscope days are long gone. Digital apples and
analog oranges are not the same critter.

cheerio,
- winfield

[Back to original message]