Posted by Roy L. Fuchs on 12/31/05 19:39

On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:33:17 GMT, spam@uce.gov (Bob) Gave us:

>On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:43:38 -0000, "John Howells"
><john@howells-99.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>You just lost because you no loner have any credibility!
>
>Don't be so eager to rush to judgement. You have no credibility
>because you have not inspected the Fuji MIJ disc.
>
>>http://www.deluxemedia.com/support/dvdtech/dvdrom/dvd_formats.xml#DVD-5
>
>According to that diagram the active material is sandwiched between
>two polycarbonate discs. The OP claimed that the active layer was on
>top, not in the middle.

No, I did not, nor did the OP. I said it was just under the top
coat. Also, I would contend that that web site has flaws in their
interpretation as well, because they do not laminated a polycarbonate
layer onto the top side.

> I claimed it was on the bottom.

Exactly. and you were incorrect. Regardless of the brand.

>We were both wrong.

You were drunk then, because I never said that it was on the top,
nor did the OP.

> I just got done breaking a Fuji MIJ disc, and it
>is composed of two essentially identical thickness polycarbonate with
>the active material sandwiched in the middle, as shown in the diagram.

So, your argument was based on a guess the whole time, even though
you claimed to have done scratch tests.

>Therefore the OP's claim that the active material is on the top is
>WRONG.

I would like to see the quote of that post.

[Back to original message]