Posted by MassiveProng on 01/15/07 15:15

On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 05:48:29 -0500, Barry Watzman
<WatzmanNOSPAM@neo.rr.com> Gave us:

>So are most of ours ... most, but not all. The news shows have an
>obvious problem, because whatever the feed from the studio (which I will
>call 4:3 HD)

No such thing, retard. So STOP spewing misinformation into the
groups.

>, so much of the insert news footage of the events being
>reported is neither HD nor widescreen, and it's pretty obvious how badly
>the resolution and image quality drops when they cut from the studio
>shots to some (not all) of the actual event coverage footage.

I know folks with IQs lower than your 40 mark that know that much.

>But almost all actual network prime time shows are being broadcast in
>widescreen HD.

Depends on the network, and the show.

> The real issue is that there are a bunch of "cable
>networks" that are not yet currently available to us in HD or even
>digital format at all (this may be a function of our cable system rather
>than of the shows). This includes MSNBC, CNBC, A&E, Discovery Channel,
>History Channel, Lifetime, etc.

Maybe you should write your congressman.

Stop top posting in Usenet, you fucking Usenet RETARD!

[Back to original message]