Posted by MassiveProng on 01/17/07 00:50

On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:13:27 -0000, "M.I.5?"
<no.one@no.where.NO_SPAM.co.uk> Gave us:

>
>"Joshua Zyber" <joshzyber@comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:l_GdnRKGp6_2VzHYnZ2dnUVZ_vCknZ2d@comcast.com...
>> "Barry Watzman" <WatzmanNOSPAM@neo.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:45ab0658$0$27045$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>>> Lots of HD (and it is HD in terms of resolution and image quality, plus
>>> the "HD" light on my cable box is on) is still 4:3. For example, the HD
>>> feed of the NBC nightly news (Brian Williams) is HD but it's not
>>> widescreen;
>>
>> Programs such as the nightly news broadcast in 4:3 on the HD channel are
>> not true HD. They're Standard Definition that's been upconverted to the
>> higher resolution. It may look better than the regular SD feed, but it's
>> not true High Definition.
>
>So you now agree that standard resolution material looks better on systems
>whose resolution is higher than the source material. That's 3 then.
>

You're a complete imbecile!

UPCONVERTED video is sent AT THE NEW, UPCONVERTED LINE COUNT,
dipshit.

Also, he was responding to the other dolt's contention that his 4:3
digital content was indeed NOT HD media.

[Back to original message]