Posted by Sammus McMouldenus on 01/20/07 09:53

mdstaben@gmail.com wrote:
> MassiveProng wrote:
> > On 17 Jan 2007 10:23:56 -0800, asjbiotek@gmail.com Gave us:
> >
> > >..microsoft
> > >is a HAS-BEEN, the new king is GOOGLE
> >
> >
> > Google is NOT an Operating System, you retarded fuck.
> >
> > YOU were a "has been" before you even got started, dipshit.
>
> Microsoft is merrily on its way to irrelevance. YOU are the dipshit,
> you little fuck loser.
>
> Now, that out of the way:
>
> Someone said to remember that the XBOX 360 is $200 less than the PS3,
> but that's not really true: The XBOX 360 with the HD DVD capability is
> about the same price, and you still have to swap the drive out to play
> games!

YEah,b ecause HD-DVDs are SOOOO essential to the experience of the
360!!! ZOMG!
Tell me, how many games on the 360 have needed swapping during play?

Zero.

How many continue their story after hours of play onto another disk and
don't require continuous swapping?

One.

How many games are there for the 360?

160.

That's 1/160th of the total number of titles for the console so far.

That figure will rise in time, but not by much and it will be J-RPGs
chock full of video.

Yeah, a great $200 investment, not having to swap a disk once in a blue
moon.

! I'm a believer in the PS3. We're only seeing the beginning of
> its life, the poor ugly (but sleek) duckling. The XBOX 360, sure, is
> sweet, but not nearly as sweet as the PS3. Not even fu-ucking close!
> Plus, it's got the ugliest look to it!

Hahahahahahaha. Good luck waiting. You wont see the best out of the PS3
for a very, very, very long time.

[Back to original message]