|
Posted by MassiveProng on 02/05/07 05:08
On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 03:42:00 GMT, JoJo@yahoo.com (JoJo#1MSFanboy) Gave
us:
>In article <gitcs214ba35jdmlbdehoocj6a7k2uruhn@4ax.com>,
>MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org says...
>>
>>On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 17:20:27 -0500, Derek Janssen <ejanss@comcast.net>
>>Gave us:
>>
>>>JoJo#1MSFanboy wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Add in the PS3 effect, the overwheming superiority of Blu-ray content
>>>>>in terms of title releases and studio support. and you know it's just
>>>>>a matter of time now before Universal (the ONLY exclusive hd-dvd
>>>>>studio as oppoed to the FIVE major studios exclusive to Blu-ray) joins
>>>>>the list of blu-ray supporters!
>>>>
>>>> LMAO!!! All those hundreds of millions of dollars Sony has been dumping
>into
>>>> the pimping of Blu-Ray and they can only match the sales of HD-DVD? I
>wonder
>>>> how long it will be before those 5 studios jump on HD-DVD.
>>>
>>>Well, three of them: Sony's still going down with their own ship, and
>>>Disney is owned by Apple, who wants to keep the codec in the QuickTime
>>>family.
>>>
>>>As for Fox and Lionsgate, it's all too easy to run over the hill, once
>>>one side or the other starts grabbing the flags.
>>>(Oh, and that would be FOUR major studios, since MGM/UA is technically a
>>>Fox company now.)
>>>
>>
>> This is going to be fun to watch whether we get enough brains to
>>boycott or not.
>>
>> You do know that boycotting BluTurd would be the best thing for us
>>economically speaking, as the sting of yet another Sony debacle will
>>be over quicker that way.
>
>
>Screw that... support them both. I want choices and alot of them.
Well, instead of a $22 movie, thanks to twits like you, they will be
more like $29 each.
[Back to original message]
|