|  | Posted by Gene on 02/05/07 22:59 
Thanks, Rick.
 I guess I do not understand what you said in #2 ?
 
 The internet is just a collection of nodes (hard drives, etc.)
 connected by various telephone, satellite, etc. - it's simply
 an expansion of the university / NASA thing that started
 years ago.  Are you saying that I should spread my family
 videos over this network of nodes?  Really do not think that I want
 complete strangers looking at my family A/Vs for any reason.
 
 If that is not what you are saying, then what specific random
 access media do you suggest that I go out and purchase today?
 
 Thanks,
 Gene
 
 
 
 
 
 
 "Rick Merrill" <rick0.merrill@NOSPAM.gmail.com> wrote in message
 news:fuednSLj4fsJP1rYnZ2dnUVZ_h2dnZ2d@comcast.com...
 > Gene wrote:
 >> I've finally concluded that there is NO good way to convert all my
 >> thousands
 >> (literally) of VHS,  8mm, H-8, D8, and MiniDV library to DVD 4.7GB discs
 >> at this time. They simply are too tiny, and double layer are too small &
 >> expensive.
 >> Blu-Ray ~27GB & the ~50GB discs will work arithmetically, or so it seems.
 >
 > 1. You're right.
 > 2. you're wrong (think outside the box) - media itself is obsolete BECAUSE
 > your valued data should be mirrored on the internet - the data will
 > migrate to hard drives and to whatever the latest and greatest (read
 > cheapest and most widespread) media there is.  I.E. you don't really CARE
 > what "media" it's on - ok, maybe I'm too far ahead of the times.
 [Back to original message] |