|  | Posted by Gene on 02/14/07 17:57 
My gut feeling is that you are correct.
 However, I really would like to see the two
 DVDs I described burned & played side-by-side.
 There is nothing like getting a report from someone
 that actually owns said camcorder type.
 
 I have a real hard time seeing the difference in
 some of this stuff, when played back on a 1080i TV.
 I agree that there are differences in quality, but I
 (and the folks watching TV with me) have a real hard time
 seeing some of the quality differences in some
 audio & video DVD-Rs.
 
 It really boils down to how much you care ~ a percent or two
 in A/V quality, IMHO. That is, non-critical home video, vs.
 the masterpiece with which you are trying to impress your boss:-)
 
 Gene
 
 
 
 
 
 "PTravel" <ptravel@travelersvideo.com> wrote in message
 news:53gvi0F1spcjsU1@mid.individual.net...
 >
 > "Gene" <genes@wildblue.net> wrote in message
 > news:4FGAh.10$jP3.76876@news.sisna.com...
 >> If anyone has something similar to this:
 >> Sanyo VPC-HD1A
 >> http://www.steves-digicams.com/2006_reviews/hd1a.html
 >> are you happy with it?
 >>
 >> ~85 minutes on a 4GB card does not sound
 >> that bad. 16GB should be out there eventually.
 >>
 >> Wonder if the A/V quality of the 720p is comparable
 >> to my current MiniDV, when both are burned to a DVD-R
 >> at max quality?  That is, if you make a 85 minute DVD-R
 >> of each at its best possible recording mode, which
 >> DVD-R of 85 minutes would be the better quality when
 >> played back on a 1080i TV?
 >>
 >> If I could get comparable DVD-Rs from this camcorder,
 >> the conversion from flash to DVD-R should be really
 >> easy on a PC with a flash reader. Kind of like the
 >> set-top conversions should be, but are not, at least
 >> for me. (Too many freezes with my Sony camcorders
 >> and firewire.)
 >>
 >> The lens on these little camcorders look a little iffy to me,
 >> just not sure how they could give the same quality
 >> as my old Sony PC100 with wide angle lens, etc?
 >
 > Standard definition DV-25 (what you get from your miniDV camcorder) has a
 > data rate of 25 mbps, using non-temporal compression at a rate of 5 to 1.
 > DVD-compliant mpeg (what is used on your DVRs) has a maximum data rate of
 > around 10 mbps, and uses temporal compression at a rate of 10 to 1 or
 > more. High definition HDV (what you get from the prosumer high def
 > camcorders) uses mpeg2 compression and also has a data rate of 25 mbps.
 > These cameras have minor, but ocassionaly noticeable, motion artifact
 > issues. AVCHD (what consumer HD camcorders use) uses mpeg4 and can, in
 > theory, have a data rate of 25 mbps, but as implemented is limited to
 > between 12 and 17 mbps. These cameras exhibit major motion artifact
 > issues.
 >
 > Thes Sanyo has a data rate of 9 mbps, roughly 2/3s to 1/2 of the consumer
 > HD data rate, and roughly 30% of the data rate of a prosumer HDV
 > camcorder.
 >
 > YMMV but, to me, it's a toy for people who don't know better.  It
 > certainly isn't going to produce video comparable to an AVCHD machine
 > (and, to me, AVCHD quality is unacceptable), and won't approach a HDV
 > machine (which, to me, is acceptable, but just).
 >
 >
 >>
 >>
 >> *********** cut-n-paste************
 >> The HD1a can record over 21 minutes of 720p
 >> HD video on a 1GB SD card or over 42 minutes
 >> on a 2GB card and is compatible with the newer
 >> 4GB size cards for even longer recording.
 >> You can record in Standard Definition mode
 >> (640 x 480 pixels at 30fps progressive) for up
 >> to two hours on a 2GB SD card. It's easy to
 >> switch between high-definition and standard-
 >> definition recording modes by simply pressing
 >> the "HD/Norm" button on the side of the camera.
 >> *************************************
 >>
 >> Gene
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >
 >
 [Back to original message] |