Posted by Gene E. Bloch on 02/16/07 18:47

On 2/16/2007, Ken Maltby posted this:
> "Gene E. Bloch" <spamfree@nobody.invalid> wrote in message
> news:mn.7cfb7d7253ed37fa.1980@nobody.invalid...
>> On 2/15/2007, Ken Maltby posted this:
>>> "Gene E. Bloch" <spamfree@nobody.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:mn.7c4b7d72d93f6796.1980@nobody.invalid...
>>>> On 2/15/2007, Frank posted this:
>>>>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:01:34 -0600, in 'rec.video.desktop',
>>>>> in article <Re: Cannot import .VOB file>,
>>>>> "Gene" <genes@wildblue.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <SNIP>
>>>>
>>>>>> Just found this one, but it looks like it runs under Windows, so ... ?
>>>>>> http://www.isobuster.com/tips.php?tips_page=1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gene
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps you missed my earlier post, but IsoBuster was what I
>>>>> suggested. :)
>>>>
>>>> Your post was just a few minutes before his - must have crossed in the
>>>> mail :-)
>>>>
>>>> -- Gene E. Bloch (Gino)
>>>> letters617blochg3251
>>>> (replace the numbers by "at" and "dotcom")
>>>>
>>>
>>> This "Gene" could have started his own thread instead of
>>> hijacking "Andy's".
>>>
>>> Luck;
>>> Ken
>>
>> I don't understand: how did I hijack Andy's thread?
>>
>> -- Gene E. Bloch (Gino)
>> letters617blochg3251
>> (replace the numbers by "at" and "dotcom")
>>
>>
>
> I meant the other "Gene", or are you that one to?
>
> Luck;
> Ken

No, I'm *this* Gene, not the other one...

Well, I did think you meant me, since you wrote that in answer to my
post with my name, Gene (not to be confused with his post with his
name, Gene).

If that's not confusing enough, I can try harder :-)

Thanks for clarifying it.

Seriously, though, I don't especially feel that Gene hijacked the
thread. Am I being too lenient?

--
Gene E. Bloch (Gino)
letters617blochg3251
(replace the numbers by "at" and "dotcom")

[Back to original message]