Posted by GMAN on 01/11/20 11:36

In article <43b957a0.2895515@news-server.houston.rr.com>, spam@uce.gov wrote:
>On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 16:11:40 GMT, "Matt" <nospam@blueyonder.co.uk>
>wrote:
>
>>> You are one sick puppy.
>
>>I'm a sick puppy but you think stealing is ok?
>
>You are one sick puppy for rushing to judgement.
>
>I NEVER said I copy anything. You assumed I did so you could spew your
>bigoted venom all over the place.
>
>I am interested in discussing the issue. My personal involvement has
>nothing to do with that discussion.
>
>People copy DVDs for personal use. That was allowed by the Fair Use
>Laws before a bunch of greedy lawyers got into forcing laws down our
>throats that a lot of people have no intention of giving their consent
>to.
>
Fair use was never put in place to allow free copying of works for the home
user. It was for educational,scientific, and the press communities so they
could use excerpts of media for purely professional review purposes. It never
did allow for complete copies of such works either, just portions of works.

>Do you enjoy fascists shoving a pole up your ass? Being from the Gay
>Capital of the World, Britain, it would not surprise me. Unarmed wimp
>peasants like the Brits enjoy the taste of the cane.
>
>The interests of the individual outweigh the interests of the state or
>its franchises like the recording industry. Just because these
>monoliths can buy congressmen means nothing in terms of serving the
>interests of individuals. But this is foreign to you who lives in a
>totalitarian dictatorship where tax bureaucrats can force their way
>into your home with a �500 fine if you do not comply.
>
>

[Back to original message]