Posted by Brenden D. Chase on 02/22/07 00:23

"Winfield" <doghouse@operamail.com> wrote in message
news:io0Dh.3687$6L3.688@newsfe08.phx...
> JoJo#1MSFanboy wrote:
>
>> It's [PS3: Edit] simply not selling near as well as the PS2. Not even
>> close.
>
>
> http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=37771
>
> - winf


"Cost is the more interesting one of the two mainly because price is
artificial, almost every console maker subsidizes the initial cost of a
console in order to sell more. The PS3 was stupidly expensive at $600, but
even at that, Sony was eating about $200 putting the cost at around $800.
They plan to make it up by getting a kickback of $10-15 per game sold, so if
the buyer buys 15 or so games over the life of the console, Sony will break
even."

You dont think that's possible??

[Back to original message]