Posted by Roberto Pirezzi on 02/26/07 17:23

"the dog from that film you saw" <dsb@REMOVETHECAPITALSbtinternet.com> wrote
in message news:54gi67F209lmtU1@mid.individual.net...
>
> "kim" <ntscuser@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:sIqdnTO15d08Un_YnZ2dnUVZ8qaqnZ2d@giganews.com...
>> http://forum.videohelp.com/viewtopic.php?t=323203
>>
>> " They are not trying very hard to make HI-DEF on Blu-Ray/HD-DVD look
>> better than DVD. I watched several HD-DVD movies this weekend at a
>> friends house on a 56" JVC D-ILA screen. Waterworld and a few other
>> HD-DVD's looked like crap. The studios did not clean up the films. There
>> were scratches, spots, hair, and dust on the transfer. This is a shoddy
>> job and personally I will NEVER pay for a movie that looks like that!
>> I've had enough of poor quality DVD transfers.
>>
>> I knew it would eventually happen to these hi-def transfers of older
>> films. The studios are rushing them to market and not spending time to
>> get a clean transfer. Sure, it looks hi-resolution, but with all the
>> scratches spots, it makes it look like crap. If us amateurs can use
>> software tools to take away spots, Hollywood should be able to also. "
>>
>
>
> nothing new there then.
> i've seen quite a few dvds that originated from a ratty old vhs - complete
> with tape stretch marks on screen.
> crap in, crap out.

I always thought the poundshop sold quality products.

l2oberto

>
>
>
> --
> Gareth.
> A french man who wanted a castle threw his cat into a pond.
> http://www.audioscrobbler.com/user/dsbmusic/
>

[Back to original message]