Posted by *alan* on 02/27/07 00:47

"Matt Ferrari" <invalidduetospamvirus@heehaw.com> wrote in message
news:s4zEh.1977$M65.1511@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net...
>
> "Matt Ferrari" <invalidduetospamvirus@heehaw.com> wrote in message
> news:mSrEh.3578$re4.907@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net...
>>
>> "*alan*" <in_flagrante@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:zRlEh.3526$re4.1238@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net...
>>>
>>> "Matt Ferrari" <invalidduetospamvirus@heehaw.com> wrote
>>>> "Bert" <Albert@coldmail.com.invalid> wrote
>>>>> Hi folks. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> I've googled WinMX and there are loads of hits so what I want to know
>>>>> is
>>>>> which is the best place to get it from?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> oddly enough not one of the top hits
>>>>
>>>> http://www.winmx.com/
>>>
>>> And with good reason --- I believe that site's been dead for a while
>>> now. Use the following:
>>> http://www.winmxgroup.com/
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alan
>>
>>
>> Ah bummer, it worked when i checked it, but maybe that was a cache stored
>> in memory
> now the site works again, niot making this up. hehaw


How very odd.
What's even odder is that BOTH sites' links to "Cache Status" and to
"Downloads" do not seem to be working . . . . .
Last week, when I checked "Cache Status" from the http://www.winmxgroup.com/
site, the familiar chart was not available, and there was a note to the
effect that winmx had been the target of its "enemies" . . . .
Do you suppose the "reactivation" of the old site, plus apparent
deactivation of cache status and download links on both sites may be due to
some sort of sabotage?

[Back to original message]