| 
	
 | 
 Posted by Charlie S. on 03/19/07 05:15 
"nobody special" <msu1049321@aol.com> wrote in message  
news:1174171974.038579.166870@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... 
> If you want to run FCP, a mac is your only choice, PC's don't run it. 
> A mac with the brand new Intel chips can run PC-Windows programs as 
> well as FCP, but you have to understand, that's a custom version of 
> FCP that will only run on that particular CPU setup and not on any old 
> power pc mac. 
> 
> No Windows PC is going to run any version of FCP however. (Adobe 
> Premiere is now again dual-platform, but you want to look out for 
> which version of the OS and processor it is set up for.) 
> 
> As far as your mac hardware choices, let me say that for someone who 
> is only dabbling at this point, it would save you a lot of money to 
> get an older non-intel powerPC chip mac or even (gulp!) a used/ 
> refurbished mac from some place like smalldog.com or Shreve systems, 
> both sources have a geat rep for service and offer warranties. Macs 
> actually hold their resale comparatively well, and compatability with 
> apps and hardware up and down the product line stays pretty good. You 
> are still getting a powerful platform on a 1 or 2-year-old machine, 
> FCP and Motion are going to work fine on it, but you will be paying 
> way less than new. That's money you can throw at a better camcorder, 
> or add-ons like the highly recommended Apple Motion, photoshop, and 
> maybe an audio program like Peak or Soundtrack. 
> 
> Understand I'm not evangelizing for the mac here, you can certainly do 
> a similar deal with pcs and older versions of Vegas, Avid, Premiere, 
> etc. and have yourself a ball editing with a powerful system, it just 
> won't be FCP like you specified. The guys that have to have the 
> bleeding-edge hardware are spending 90 percent of their money wad to 
> get that last 10 pecent better performance, because they need it for 
> network-level work. At the level of what you suggest you want to do, 
> you will have more than enough horsepower to be happy for quite a 
> while as you learn, and if you get the itch to upgrade later, the 
> upgrades will be less expensive too. 
> 
> The reason not to edit off an imac or the mac mini or their laptops is 
> not anything to do with the monitors, or even the processors, but the 
> chassis is too small to add on more drive space, and for any kind of 
> serious editing, you want a dedicated media drive. You can go with 
> external firewire raid drives or single drives if they are fast 
> enough. Regarding monitors, I have been editing off the largest 
> macbook pro lately, and while it certainly has the power, I still need 
> external drives, and the large screen on the laptop is still too small 
> for my aging eyes; I would not want to edit off the laptop every day, 
> but only for short occasional use in the field. 
> 
> Here's what i would suggest for your needs: 
> 
> I would suggest a one to two-year-old mac tower system with one, or 
> perferably dual processors, all the RAM you can afford, a gig or more 
> is good, long as it all matches and is within spec, and a very fast 
> media drive either mounted in the tower or external via firewire. Get 
> the latest version of the OS it came with, and pay for quicktime pro 
> as well, that's dirt cheap. You can start with FCP Express, which is 
> the same as a full verson of Final Cut, but half the price, just 
> limited to DV footage only, and a  few of the most esoteric functions 
> you'd likely never need, disabled. Once you've mastered express and 
> feelt he need ot push it up a notch, an upgrade to FCP Studio will be 
> affordable. 
> 
> Even less expensive: some folks enjoy the free imovie HD, which shares 
> a lot of features with FCP, but is a more basic program. Numerous 
> after-market add-ons that add in advanced featuers are available for 
> around $25 or so per feature set, you can pick and choose a la carte 
> what funky wipes and other effects you might want to add.  Should you 
> decide to bail after some time, the mac will still fetch about 60 
> percent of it's original price until it's more than 5 years old. 
 
1.  Thanks for your thorough and helpful response.  Checked out  
Smalldog.com.  Found this used unit on sale for $1500.  
http://www.smalldog.com/product/41105 
Still would need to buy at least one new hard drive, plus a DVD Re-writable.  
That might add another $150 or so to the system.  Anything else I might need  
besides software?  I'm going to check other sites.  (Thought this unit would  
make a good baseline as to what I might need.) 
 
I know someone who can help me out with buying a used Mac unit.  This is  
most likely the route I will follow. 
 
2.  You mentioned the following.. 
 
"A mac with the brand new Intel chips can run PC-Windows programs as 
> well as FCP, but you have to understand, that's a custom version of 
> FCP that will only run on that particular CPU setup and not on any old 
> power pc mac." 
 
So, if I were to eventually buy an Intel computer, I would have to buy an  
updated version of FCP.  Is this a major expense?  Or, is there some sort of  
licensing transfer with minimal fees?  (Knowing Apple, nothing is minimal.) 
 
3.  Originally, I was going to buy a PC anyway.  Buying a Mac Pro might  
allow me to kill two birds with one stone.  Although to be honest, I  
originally wasn't going to spend more than $1000 on the PC.  And, if this  
dual platform is anything like the PC simulation software Mac put out years  
ago,  I'd rather use an abacus. 
 
My questions: 
a. Could one edit on both platforms with this computer?  For example, use  
Vegas on the PC side and FCP on the Mac platform? 
 
b.  Are there conflicts, such as; saving two types of formats on the same  
hard drives or running anti-virus protection?  Seems like I would be better  
off with a separate unit.  Since I primarily use the PC for work and home  
use.  What's your opinion?  Are there drawbacks? 
 
 
 
 
>
 
[Back to original message] 
 |