| 
 Posted by AZ Nomad on 03/22/07 14:56 
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:59:05 GMT, Stuart <stuart@whodunnit8.com> wrote: 
 
 
 
>"Mark W" <s@o> wrote in message  
>news:46024bb7$1_2@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com... 
>> 
>> I'm sure there are some 'audiophile' types who are able to tell the  
>> difference between a factory pressed DVD and a copy burned on a recordable  
>> disc. 
 
>The reality in the digital domain is you don't make 'a copy' you simply  
>replicate the original. So if I make a 'copy' of a CD audio disc it is not  
>going to suffer any audio quality in the same sense as making a copy of a  
>copy of a copy of a tape in the analog domain. You can get accumulated  
>digital artefacts - I mention that before the pedants chime in - but these  
>are not common unless you are using crappy gear and crappy discs.  
 
 
You can't make a bit copy of a DVD that has been encrypted.  It will not 
play.  To copy a DVD, it must be remastered.  To make matters worse, although 
copies can be made with bit-identical copies of the video files, most copies 
are made with the data compressed further in order to fit on a single layer 
blank.
 
[Back to original message] 
 |