|  | Posted by GeekBoy on 04/09/07 19:29 
"David McCall" <news@junk.us> wrote in message news:mavSh.4961$FC5.4770@trndny06...
 >
 > "Steve King" <steveSPAMBLOCK@stevekingSPAMBLOCK.net> wrote in message
 > news:k9SdnSkkh6HA54fbnZ2dnUVZ_vGinZ2d@comcast.com...
 >>
 >> Whether a fluid head performs satisfactorily is truly a personal
 >> preference. If you want smooth pan at telephoto extremes I haven't found
 >> anything under a few thousand dollars that is satisfactory.  That doesn't
 >> mean that I don't use lesser expensive tri-pod head configurations from
 >> time to time, but they don't make me happy generally.  Of course, cost
 >> and portability are sometimes even more important.  As you are testing,
 >> pay particular attention to the ability to smoothly start and stop pans
 >> and tilts.  Many cheaper fluid heads will pan just fine after you get
 >> them going.  Unfortunately, jerky starts and stops call attention to
 >> themselves.  Sometimes this deficiency can be overcome with operator
 >> technique.  Sometimes not.
 >>
 >> Steve King
 > The built in image stabilization can sometime affect the starts and stops.
 > It might be best to turn off stabilization when trying to do smooth moves.
 >
 > Too much "drag" can also be an issue with cheap tripods.
 > Sometimes the top of the tripod will twist a little as you pan,
 > then spring back when you end the pan.
 
 This particular model does have a slight play in the head at the main shaft
 (not the fluid pan area), but does not spring at all.
 
 >
 > Just a couple thoughts.
 >
 > David
 >
 [Back to original message] |