Reply to Re: why 2.35:1 ?

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by Sean O'Hara on 04/24/07 02:09

In the Year of the Golden Pig, the Great and Powerful Jay G. declared:
>
> It's doubtful anyone of importance is going to "get rid" of 2.35:1 as a
> viable aspect ratio. You can feel free to boycott any titles released in
> 2.35:1, although it's doubtful the movie studios are going to miss your
> single rental of their title.

Well, he can buy the DVD of Gilliam's Tideland, which does indeed
crop the 2:35:1 theatrical ratio to 1:77:1.

--
Sean O'Hara <http://diogenes-sinope.blogspot.com>
Wally: Ratso Rizzo's not the kind of character that looks good on
Taco Bell cups.
--Mission Hill

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"