Reply to Re: why 2.35:1 ?

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by SuperM on 04/25/07 00:32

On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:58:34 -0400, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:

>"Anamorphic" for film shouldn't be confused with "anamorphic enhancement"
>on DVDs,


Exactly!

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"