Reply to Re: why 2.35:1 ?

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by Richard C. on 04/28/07 16:12

"SuperM" <SuperM@ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote in
message news:6445339aqcgsnon0r3jgc08pdvq81h1jag@4ax.com...
>>
>>Take a look at the Criterion edition of Lawrence of Arabia sometime.
>>It was shot in 70mm and in 16:9.
>
no - it was 2.20:1......

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"