Reply to Re: why 2.35:1 ?

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by BlueBuyYoo on 04/30/07 14:34

In <slrnf3bu2i.3ok.nospam@debian.dns2go.com> Justin <nospam@insightbb.com> writes:

>SuperM@ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org wrote on [Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:51:02 -0700]:
>> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:26:21 -0400, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>>
>>>
>>>Richard's using Outlook Express, probably viewing the messages in Times New
>>>Roman font, which doesn't preserve the "equal spacing for each character"
>>>rule that's needed for ASCII art. It probably does look like just a bunch
>>>of gibberish to him, forming no coherent image.
>>>
>>>Richard, if you copy the text in question and paste it to notepad, you'll
>>>see what Justin was intending.
>>
>> Even Notepad allows the wrong font to be used. All he needs is what is
>> called a "proportional font" and most REAL Usenet folks use one, because
>> that is and has been traditional for decades.

>Actually, he needs a fixed-width font. Which is was REAL usenet folk
>use.

Actually, it is considered bad form to have a .sig more than 4 lines.

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"