Posted by Spex on 05/12/07 23:08

nappy wrote:
> "ushere" <removethis.leslie.wand@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:GC71i.36814$M.2951@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
>> why? there's a plethora of relatively cheap software out there that will
>> handle avchd,
>> if someone is going to invest in any of those programs (i use vegas
>> which DOES support avchd), then why would they spend $500+ on a program
>> and then use a crappy camera. and yes, i did say crappy camera because
>> at the moment, it looks like all the avchd cameras are built like
>> fisher-price toys, with awful lens', and and little thought as to sound,
>> etc.,
>>
>> leslie.
>
> Agreed. Seems off-topic here to discuss these toys.
>
>
LOL.

Harsh..

But Fair...

[Back to original message]