Posted by Roy L. Fuchs on 01/10/06 21:13

On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:10:47 GMT, Justin <nospam@insightbb.com> Gave
us:

>Roy L Fuchs wrote on [Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:00:00 GMT]:
>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:42:02 GMT, Justin <nospam@insightbb.com> Gave
>> us:
>>
>>>Bob wrote on [Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:40:28 GMT]:
>>>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:43:31 GMT, Justin <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Whether or not it affects sales is still debated,
>>>>
>>>> OK.
>>>>
>>>>>but costs are created by fighting piracy at the very least that
>>>>>filter back to the consumer.
>>>>
>>>> Those costs are self inflicted.
>>>
>>>No, those costs are brought about 100% by piracy. They are just the
>>>visible effects.
>>
>>
>> Seems folks like Bill, with his alcoholic stupor, and the other
>> twits, with their gang boy mentality, will never get it.
>
>heh. Advertising against piracy is a self-inflicted cost. Uh huh, sure.
>If there were no piracy or theft of IP then there would be no need for
>the anti-piracy campaign now, would there.


Watch out, man! The low, unibrow idiots are gonna come at ya with
declarations of lies for that one! :-]

[Back to original message]