Posted by ThePunisher on 05/17/07 22:21

Woden wrote:
>> Well sorry if it seemed to be an obvious answer, but..... if that
>> recent version is "re-mastered" then there's something seriously
>> wrong somewhere. Further, another 5 versions does not mean to me
>> that they are going to change their track record and release a
>> quality product. It may mean they are going to release another 5
>> substandard version at a hefty price tag, which would seem to fit
>> their modus operandi. I would love a couple of different versions,
>> but I'd very happily settle for one decent version. Do you know that a
>> high quality version will be included? Sources
>> please.
>
> Have you compared the remastered to the original release? Vast
> differences in picture quality....but that was all - it was only a
> remastered picture and nothing else.
>
> You had a release that was a film-only. At least the new one will be
> with extras. Rare versions and will probably get an HD release. Did
> the recent one get an HD release? I believe it did.
>
> I'm just the messenger bud - we've never had a 'decent' release of
> Blade Runner - this looks to be it.
>
> Why so down?
>
> At least it's not LOTR or Star Wars with a new version every six
> months!

I have the HD version and it's absolutely gorgeous.

--
ThePunisher

[Back to original message]