Posted by dgates on 06/10/07 06:36

On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 23:33:11 -0400, "Robo-man" <duffy12@cox.net> wrote:

>
>"Beowulfie" <enigma@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:136mqes7a0usodc@corp.supernews.com...
>> Why in the world has Target put out a "special Target" box Alien with only
>> the first three movies? Are we supposed to forget number 4? Why not drop
>> the third also since it was as bad as the fourth one.
>
>Even though #3 was a screw up. It still has its moments. But #4 is an
>abortion. Absolutely unwatchable from start to finish. With NO moments
>whatsoever. I need an airsick bag just thinking about it.


Different strokes, eh? I liked 4 more than 3 by a longshot. In fact,
I was fairly pleased, walking out of the the theater after seeing it.

I'll take a movie that has a scene like this:

http://i.imdb.com/Photos/Ss/0118583/7113_16_2.jpg

over a movie with a scene like this:

http://i.imdb.com/Photos/Ss/0103644/IMG0038.jpg

:-)

That said, no need for us to debate the point. You've certainly got
the numbers on your side. From IMDB:

Alien 3: 6.4
Alien 4: 6.0

[Back to original message]