Posted by dgates on 06/14/07 16:48

On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:47:15 +0100, "Mark W" <s@o> wrote:

>
>"Robo-man" <duffy12@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:ajKai.542435$2Q1.407027@newsfe16.lga...
>>
>> "Beowulfie" <enigma@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:136mqes7a0usodc@corp.supernews.com...
>>> Why in the world has Target put out a "special Target" box Alien with
>>> only the first three movies? Are we supposed to forget number 4? Why not
>>> drop the third also since it was as bad as the fourth one.
>>
>> Even though #3 was a screw up. It still has its moments. But #4 is an
>> abortion. Absolutely unwatchable from start to finish. With NO moments
>> whatsoever. I need an airsick bag just thinking about it.
>>
>
>Alien Resurrection is not so bad if you imagine it's like a film version of
>one of those Alien comic books.

Or imagine that it's a little like City of Lost Children, with aliens
and some strange sexuality thrown in :-)

[Back to original message]