Posted by moral majority on 06/25/07 04:27

On Jun 23, 3:10 pm, No One <n...@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote:
> moral majority <ohsi...@yahoo.com> writes:
> > On Jun 18, 4:06 pm, "Keith Schiffner" <schis...@bresnan.net> wrote:
> > > "Anna" <annalidd...@lycos.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:1182191393.748363.320610@q69g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> > > Yes you can. That facts bear out most pedophiles are straight
> > > men.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > What facts? Do you have federal crime data statistics? 90% of
> > homosexual priests molested other males. Kind of makes them
> > homosexuals by definition in my book.
>
> Federal crime statistics have been posted multiple times regarding
> such claims and they clearly show that gays are no more likely to be
> pedophiles than straights, maybe less so. No matter how many times
> the facts are posted, the same claim you are making comes up, so I
> really on't think you people have any interest in the facts.
>
I am interested in the facts. Where have they been posted multiple
times? I just search all 177995 posts in rec.models.rc.air for
"Federal crime" and "crime statistic" and came up empty. Can you give
us the government website from which these "statistics" can be read or
derived?

> I'm curious about one thing you stated though: your "90%" figure.
> What did the other 10% do? Stay celebate, have sex with only
> adults by mutual consent, or "molest" females?
>
I apologise for my poor grammatical constuction. I meant to claim
that of the 3 or 4 percent (RCCC claim) of Roman Catholic Church
Corporation priests that have been proven to have molested children,
almost all have molested male children. Why? Because almost all who
got caught are sodomites :-). I have had a theory for 2 or 3 decades
that being a priest or nun is very difficult because you have to
abstain from sex, but it's not so difficult if you didn't like sex
(with people of the oppsite sex) in the first place (and thus had no
desire to ever get married). BTW, I'm a pape who attends mass about
60 times a year / my wife goes about 250 times a year.

> > Every civilization has a right to set codes and standards of conduct
> > and punish those who refuse to conform. The solution is to make
> > homosexual behavior a felony like it use to be and should still be.
>
> Given a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling, you simply can't do that
> without a constitutional amendment.

It can be done if we get more Supremes who believe the position
entails interpreting the constitution as it was written and
interpreted by the Founders. OTOH, I have no real objections to
changing the constitution, especially now that even a bind person can
see that the republicans have abandoned America too. All they care
about is multinational corporation handouts to them, in exchange for
sending all of the manufacturing to 3rd world countries and sending
half the 3rd world population here to destroy our standard of
living. Same goes for the bitter America hating old media. The way
things are now, the whole country just keeps accelerating downhill at
an ever more rapid pace to hedonism. The rest of you can stay behind
and get converted to Islam or lose your heads. If you think us decent
peopl are retrograde, you ain't seen nothin' yet :-)

The founders said that freedom and responsibility or intertwined.
It's overdue for all the hardworking decent people to leave for
another land, to start a new country with the old rules, or take over
an existing country by vote. It appears in this end game, that
freedom is not compatible with democracy, which is why it is illegal
for anyone but a Jew to be Prime Minister of Israel, and why the Roman
Empire finally crumbled.

You might consider trying to
> build a time machine so you can move to Nazi Germany. You won't get
> very far, but at least the time you spend on the project will keep
> you away from usenet.

You might consider getting a female friend.

[Back to original message]