Posted by �|��T?ߪRt?@$t on 07/06/07 13:18

Apart from being a daft cunt, and a right prat, it seems your stupidity is
not confined to this news group, you seem to have been making a public
spectacle of yourself with postings all over Usenet, with similar results.

It is better to keep quiet and appear stupid, than to start posting garbage
and remove all doubt.

And, oh I forgot to mention, you appear to be an American twat..............
something of a national pastime I believe.


"NRen2k5" <nomore@email.com> wrote in message
news:mjpji.37537$HP3.247106@weber.videotron.net...
> brigstockedavid@yahoo.com wrote:
>> I've been ripping some classical CDs using Exact Audio Copy (I'm a
>> beginner and most of its features are a mystery to me), and LAME.
>>
>> One problem is that some of these CDs have 'tracks' that aren't
>> really separate tracks - the music is continuous, and the track
>> number is really just a way of letting you get to that part of the
>> symphony or whatever.
>>
>> EAC treats these as separate tracks, however, and the result is that
>> a fraction of a second of the music is missing at the beginning of
>> each track. It even sometimes misses a bit off the beginning of a
>> track that really *is* a separate track.
>>
>> One solution would be to have it rip the whole CD as if it were one big
>> track, but I can't see how to do this.
>>
>> Is there a way?
>
> Yes. "Action" ? "Copy range"
>
> By the way, it isn't EAC that's missing a bit of music at the beginning
> of each track. Either your CD drive isn't ripping the CD audio properly,
> or your MP3 player isn't playing the MP3s properly. EAC is a very good
> ripper, and LAME MP3s contain metadata that allows them to be played
> back completely and without gaps.

[Back to original message]