Posted by NRen2k5 on 07/07/07 12:10

Broadway Blue wrote:
> Joel wrote:
>> "з|коT?▀кRt?@$t" <з|коT?▀кRt?@$t@norway_coastline.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Go and fuck yourself you daft cunt, your the same wanker that
>>> thinks joint stereo is better than proper stereo.
>>
>> I actually thought suggesting CDex was a good idea, but pray tell,
>> what *is* "proper" stereo? Using that kind of language blatantly
>> shows your bias. Joint stereo is used *selectively*, when it won't
>> lose stereo separation, unless you force it on all frames. Even
>> if you use 320 Kbps CBR, joint stereo helps.
>
> EMI in the UK have recently allowed the release of 'DRM free' online
> MP3 downloads that are encoded @ 320 Kbps CBR Joint-Stereo files!
> (Using Lame v3.97)

That’s nice. I remember them releasing a limited edition Gorillaz song a
couple of years ago and they used 128kbps pure LR stereo then. I don’t
know what else they did to that poor song. It sounded like ass!

[Back to original message]